Author: Sadia Hameed

Why Were Women’s Bodies Policed By Hijab After The New Zealand Terror Attack?

Why Were Women’s Bodies Policed By Hijab After The New Zealand Terror Attack?

The Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain’s Response To Hijab Being Used As A Symbol Of Solidarity In The Aftermath Of The New Zealand Terrorist Attack. 

More than a week on from the horrific far right and white supremacist attack on New Zealand, we at the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain are still grieving for those who were lost, or had their lives destroyed. As we have already said, the majority of our members and volunteers are from Muslim families and communities, so the people killed or critically injured at the 2 mosques that were attacked could have been our loved ones.

We have largely been very impressed by the response to the attacks led by Prime Minister Jacinda Arden. Where other politicians have used similar events to create division, she has shown great leadership in bringing people together and showing love to those affected and the wider Muslim community. We strongly welcome the New Zealand government’s decision to ban assault weapons, set up a financial fund to help support victims and bereaved families and pay for the funerals of those who were lost. We also welcome Ms Arden’s decision not to name the terrorist and give him the notoriety he was seeking. Largely, she has proven herself a strong leader who has set an example for other politicians around the world.

However, we are very disappointed to see that during the official remembrance service for the fallen dead, the New Zealand women attending were expected to cover their heads with a hijab as a mark of “honour”, “respect” and “solidarity” towards the victims and Muslim community. We believe this is the worst kind of emotional blackmail. In performing this ceremony this way, a woman who refuses to partake in the religious practices of veiling is immediately defined as someone who has no respect, solidarity or honour. This sort of pressure surely violates the right to freedom of and freedom from religion. The women of New Zealand are stricken by grief, why should their bodies be policed?

As well as creating unfair religious pressure on the wider community of New Zealand, the decision to ask women to veil to honour the victims has massively alienated unveiled women from within the Muslim community. Not all Muslim women wear hijabs, including ones who are devout believers, infact many actively resist the practise. Similarly as ex-Muslim women who choose not to be covered, we also fight for the right to be free of hijab. Unfortunately, women from Muslim majority societies and communities who do not veil are often harassed, pressured or shamed for not veiling. Accusations of “disrespect” are commonly aimed at unveiled women. Our worry if that if it was our loved ones killed in the terrorist attacks, we would be accused of disrespect as we mourned. What’s more, this also feels like part of a wider move by Islamists to errase unveiled women from Muslim majority countries and communities, in the eyes of the wider world. Its working. To many, we simply don’t exist.

What makes this all the more disappointing is that Ms Arden is an apostate of Mormonism, a very high control religion which is very difficult to leave. She has spoken publicly about her experiences and has helped to shine a light on the issue of apostasy and religious descent as a civil right. We believe if we could speak to her, she would understand our point of view, but sadly the cultural damage has already been done.

Whatever happens next the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain will continue to resist all forms of extremism including the white supremacist far right movement and Islamism. We will also continue to mourn the victims of the Christchurch terrorist attacks on our own terms, whilst fighting for our own autonomy.

Solidarity with Parkfield School Birmingham – No to Religious Homophobia

In 2016 Parkfield community school in Saltley, Birmingham was awarded Outstanding by Ofsted in every single area of inspection, Effectiveness of leadership and management, Quality of teaching, learning and assessment, Personal development, behaviour and welfare, Outcomes for pupils and Early years provision. Furthermore, the Ofsted report stated that the school fully delivers on its aim that ‘Together we can make a huge difference’.

Many parents would be grateful for their children to be sent to a high performing school, that ensures, as the report states, their students and staff, “are made to feel valued”.

Parkfield delivers a program called no the No Outsiders program, which teaches some of the basic characteristic of the Equalities Act 2010:

• age
• disability
• gender reassignment
• marriage and civil partnership
• pregnancy or maternity
• race
• religion or belief
• sex
• sexual orientation.

The program is intended to explain to children that diversity exists and that regardless of such diversity, everyone has the right to be treated and respected equally. That regardless of differences, you have the capacity to be friends.

Recently the school became the target of the religious fundamentalist parents. Muslim parents of some of the pupils protested outside the school with signs reading, “say no to promoting of homosexuality and LGBT ways of life to our children”, “stop exploiting children’s innocence”, and “education not indoctrination”.

The parents are right in one sense alone, education is not about indoctrination, it is about preparing children for their futures, and opening their minds to the diversity within society.

Let’s call this what it is, it is religiously charged, homophobia. When the issue of religious homophobia cropped up, some of the mothers leading the charge, stated that it was nothing to do with their homophobia or religion, that they simply feel that their children are too young and that the contents of the lessons are inappropriate and leading their children to feeling confused.
This is a convenient excuse for parents to cover up their religiously charged homophobia. Unfortunately, due to the space allowed to these Muslim fundamentalist parents, Christian and far right homophobic fundamentalists have also crawled out of the woodwork to join in solidarity with these bigoted parents.

Regrettably, the actions of these parents worst effect those young Muslims that are LGBT in the community, instilling within them self-loathing, shame and embarrassment, which is further encouraged by the likes of Labour MP, Shabana Mahmood, who fully supports and condones the homophobia of their parents.

If the No Outsiders program is scrapped and parents are permitted to have their way, how long before other elements of the Equalities Act are attacked and undermined? Tomorrow, far right groups might start campaigning outside schools, shouting that they don’t want their children being exposed to the idea that it is OK to be Muslim or Jewish as it “confuses their children”. This is a very slippery road that we are on, if we bend the law for one group, others will demand the same. That was exactly what the Equalities Act was created to prevent.

For more information, please contact

Sadia Hameed
Spokesperson
Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain
sadia.hameed@ex-muslim.org.uk

Subscribe to our Newsletter

CEMB Logo© 2017 - All rights reserved.
UK Atheist Top 5 Blogs
Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain is a limited by guarantee Company registered in England & Wales.
Registration number 8059509.
Designed with in London

X